Protect Against Wood-frame Construction Hazards With CPL Insurance

June 18, 2019
Drew Rothman - Construction Executive

Low cost and availability have combined in recent years to make wood-frame construction extremely popular for building everything from apartment complexes to mixed use facilities. In addition to conforming easily to the designs of most structures, cedar, pine and other types of softwood are currently meeting the growing demands of owners and developers for green building and sustainability products.

However, a learning curve does exist in the United States for wood-frame contractors looking to overcome the safety, project management, structural, moisture and design challenges that can plague these projects—many of which can result in pollution conditions. This includes the implementation of risk management strategies such as the adoption of insurance forms to control wide-ranging pollution problems and better schedule planning to avoid the adverse effects of seasonal weather conditions. Other strategies entail the negotiation of contract terms that protect against delayed claims; combating mold through procedures that ensure the building’s dryness; and protecting against moisture problems during the wood’s transport and storage.

Reprinted courtesy of Drew Rothman, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.


Court Upholds Insurance Commissioner’s Penalties for Broker’s Fees, Which Constituted Premiums in Excess of Approved Rates

June 10, 2019
Christopher Kendrick & Valerie A. Moore – Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

In Mercury Insurance Co. v. Lara (No. G054496, filed 5/7/19), a California appeals court ruled that the California Insurance Commissioner had the authority to impose penalties of $27,593,550 against Mercury Insurance Company for fees charged by brokers issuing its policies, because the brokers were de facto agents of the insurer, and the fees constituted premium in excess of the insurer’s approved rate.

Under insurance regulations, an insurance broker can charge a fee for services, but an agent cannot. (10 Cal. Code Regs., § 2189.3(c).) After Proposition 103 passed in 1988, and following adoption of regulations pursuant to the law, insurers were required to obtain approval of rates, meaning the premium charged. (Ins. Code, §§ 1861.01, et seq.) That was later defined as both direct and indirect costs associated with providing insurance coverage and any profit or additional assessment charged. (Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc. (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 1305.)

Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Kendrick, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP and Valerie A. Moore, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP
Mr. Kendrick may be contacted at ckendrick@hbblaw.com
Ms. Moore may be contacted at vmoore@hbblaw.com


Subrogation, Insurance Code Section 11580, and the Craziness We Call Insurance Law

June 3, 2019
Garret Murai - California Construction Law Blog

If you want to geek out on insurance law the next case is for you. The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. American Safety Indemnity Company, 2nd District Court of Appeals, Case No. B283684 (March 1, 2019), is an interesting case involving Insurance Code Section 11580, which in essence provides that if a judgment is entered against an insured (and there is coverage for that insured) the insured may sue the insurance company to pay for the judgment.

However, in this case, the party doing the suing was the insurer of a general contractor that had a judgment entered against it, and the party being sued was the insurer of subcontractor, on subrogation basis.

Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@wendel.com


When Virginia Insurance Brokers Sought to End EMR Misuse

May 27, 2019
Jim Parsons - Engineering News-Record

Virginia is the only state that has solved the EMR misuse problem with a law. Since 2016, the state has prohibited use of a particular EMR as a condition for eligibility to participate in solicitations for construction services, including private construction projects not covered by the state’s public procurement rules. The state’s Dept. of Transportation does gather EMRs from prospective contractors, but they are a small part of the overall safety evaluation.

ENR may be contacted at ENR.com@bnpmedia.com


Wisconsin Tests Breadth of Duty to Defend: Declines to Strip Wholesaler of Defense

May 20, 2019
William S. Bennett - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

Wisconsin’s Supreme Court recently held that even where a complaint generally alleges a company acted wrongfully and with intent to defraud, a single potentially covered claim still triggers the duty to defend. The case is yet another in a long line of state high court decisions finding that the duty to defend is exceedingly broad and applies where there is a single potentially covered claim.

Mr. Bennett may be contacted at wsb@sdvlaw.com


Hoping Pharrell Is “Happy” That He Obtained Event Cancellation Insurance For Something In the Water Festival

May 13, 2019
Sergio F. Oehninger & Latosha M. Ellis - Hunton Andrews Kurth

The cancellation of the first day of music mogul Pharrell Williams’s inaugural Something In the Water Music Festival (SITW) in Virginia Beach, Virginia due to stormy weather is a recent reminder of the importance of securing event cancellation and business interruption insurance to mitigate the significant economic risks posed by outdoor events.

SITW, Williams’ tribute to his home state of Virginia, brought a convergence of musicians, personalities, scholars, students, artists, activists, and athletes together for a multi-day festival experience on Virginia Beach. SITW featured music performances from Williams and Friends, including Virginia natives Missy Elliot, Pusha T, D.R.A.M., and Dave Matthews Band. Williams surprised festivalgoers with a number of guest appearances including Jay-Z, Snoop Dogg, and P. Diddy.

Reprinted courtesy of Sergio F. Oehninger, Hunton Andrews Kurth and Latosha M. Ellis, Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mr. Oehninger may be contacted at soehninger@HuntonAK.com
Ms. Ellis may be contacted at lellis@HuntonAK.com


60-Day Clock For Statutory Bad Faith “Cure Period” Starts When Civil Remedy Notice Electronically Filed

May 6, 2019
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal Updates

The Second District Court of Appeal in Harper v. Geico General Insurance Company, 44 Fla.L.Weekly D618c (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) explained that the 60-day clock for a statutory bad faith cure period STARTS when the civil remedy notice is electronically filed with Florida’s Department of Financial Services:

Subsection 624.155(3)(d) plainly states that no action shall lie if the damages are paid or corrective action is taken within sixty days after the insured files the CRN [Civil Remedy Notice]. Under current procedures, an insured files a CRN with the Department electronically. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 69J-123.002(1). And while the Department also requires the insured to print a copy of the completed CRN from the Department’s website and send it to the insurer, the Department nevertheless considers the form to be “filed” when the insured clicks the “submit” button at the end of the electronic form.[...]

Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com


Sorting Insurers' Obligations in Light of Competing Other Insurance Provisions

May 1, 2019
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law Hawaii

The court determined that the non-participating insurer must reimburse the insurer who defended. Steadfast Ins. Co. v. Greenwich Ins. Co., 2019 Wisc. LEXIS 9 (Wis. Jan. 25, 2019).

Historic rains hit Milwaukee in June 2008, overwhelming the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewage District's (MMSD) sewage system. Raw sewage backed up into 8,000 homes. Lawsuits were filed against MMSD and two companies who MMSD contracted with the operate and maintain the sewage system, Veolia Water Milwaukee and United Water Services Milwaukee.

Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


France’s Axa Insured Notre Dame Art, Two Construction Firms

April 22, 2019
Katherine Chiglinsky - Bloomberg

French insurer Axa SA could be on the hook for potential payouts tied to the devastating fire that ripped through Notre-Dame Cathedral, but the government’s ownership of the landmark means the insurance industry could be spared from significant losses tied to the blaze.


Fire Safety and Restoration Essentials in Commercial Construction

April 17, 2019
Tami Casey - Construction Executive

Although commercial contractors are usually aware of the dangers of fires at jobsites, that doesn’t mean they are prepared for one. For many, a big part of the problem is putting too much faith in their builder’s risk insurance policy without understanding the minutiae. For others an “it won’t happen to me” attitude is the culprit. Whatever the case, inadequate fire preparedness can lead to significant delays and exponential cost increases when the worst happens. When it comes to preparing for fire risk, having the right insurance is only the beginning of what’s important.

Establishing a Comprehensive Builder’s Risk Policy
Given a lack of functional fire protection systems, new construction and renovation projects are more susceptible to fires. Builder’s risk insurance provides vital protection during this vulnerable time; however, builders commonly make errors and oversights that cost them when putting together policies and fulfilling reporting requirements. For instance, builders who fail to properly report the actual percent complete in their evaluation could be underinsured if peril strikes.

Reprinted courtesy of Tami Casey, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.


Fifth Circuit Addresses When A Law Firm Should Reasonably Expect A Future Claim In Analyzing Policy Rescission

April 10, 2019
Brian C. Bassett - TLSS Insurance Law Blog

In Imperium Ins. Co. v. Shelton & Assocs., 2019 WL 1096336 (5th Cir. March 6, 2019), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit addressed when a lawyer’s professional liability policy may be rescinded based on material misrepresentations in an application concerning potential claims against the firm.

Shelton & Associates, P.A., (“Shelton”) was issued a professional liability insurance policy from Imperium Insurance Company (“Imperium”), on January 24, 2013. Shelton was designated as the “Named Insured” on the policy and the policy’s coverage period extended from February 1, 2013 until February 1, 2014.

Mr. Bassett may be contacted at bbassett@tlsslaw.com


Michigan Court Addresses Claim Reporting Obligations Under E&O Policy

April 3, 2019
Brian Bassett - TLSS Insurance Law Blog

In Illinois National Ins. Co. v. AlixPartners, LLP, 2019 WL 939018 (Mich. App. Ct. Feb. 26, 2019), a Michigan appellate court addressed an insured’s obligation to report a claim under a professional liability policy in order to satisfy the policy’s claims made and reported requirements.

Illinois National Insurance Company (“Illinois National”) sued to recoup the payment of an arbitration award on AlixPartners LLP’s (“AlixPartners”) behalf in February 2013. After making the payment, Illinois National asserted that it should not have paid because the claim was not covered under any of the professional liability policies it issued to AlixPartners.

Mr. Bassett may be contacted at bbassett@tlsslaw.com


Property Insurer Invoking Appraisal under Property Insurance

March 27, 2019
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal Updates

Property insurance policies routinely contain an appraisal provision. The provision may read something to the effect:

If you and we fail to agree on the amount of loss, either may request an appraisal of the loss. However, both parties must agree to the appraisal. In this event, each party will choose a competent and impartial appraiser within 20 days after receiving a written request from the other. . . . If they fail to agree, they will submit their differences to the umpire. A decision agreed to by any two will set the amount of the loss.

Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com


The United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, Finds Wrap-Up Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage of Additional Insureds

March 18, 2019
Callie E. Waers, Esq. - Florida Construction Law News

The United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, recently took a close look at the application of a “controlled insurance program exclusion” (wrap-up exclusion) to additional insureds on a commercial general liability policy. In Cont’l Cas. Co. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 886 F.3d 366 (4th Cir. 2018), the Fourth Circuit examined the interplay of an enrolled party’s additional insured status on an unenrolled party’s commercial general liability (“CGL”) policy with a wrap-up exclusion. The court applied North Carolina law and found that pursuant to the policy’s own language, the exclusion only applied to the original named insured, not the additional insureds.

Ms. Waers may be contacted at Callie.Waers@csklegal.com


Maximizing Mandated Mediation in D&O Coverage Disputes

March 4, 2019
John McCarrick & Giulio Zanolla - White and Williams LLP

Many D&O insurance policies include a contractual requirement that the D&O insurer and policyholder attempt a negotiated resolution, typically through mediation, of any coverage-related dispute between the parties before the parties can resort to litigation or arbitration. However, too often such requirements lead to an unproductive mediation session – not because the process is flawed, but because the parties can have unrealistic expectations about what can be achieved through a mandatory mediation process.

Mr. McCarrick may be contacted at mccarrickj@whiteandwilliams.com


DFS Wins New York State Appeal Reinstating Portions of Regulation Aimed at Controlling Title Insurance “Marketing” Expenses

February 27, 2019
Steven Ostrow, Steven Coury & Patrick Haggerty - White and Williams LLP

On January 15, 2019, a New York appellate court reinstated portions of Insurance Regulation 208, which was promulgated by the Department of Financial Services (DFS) in December 2017. The regulation prohibited title insurers from “wining and dining” attorneys and other agents in the real estate market in exchange for business referrals, while passing those costs through to the consumers. The appellate court decision overturned a 2018 New York lower court ruling that annulled Insurance Regulation 208 in its entirety on the grounds that its provisions were arbitrary and capricious and that the regulation exceeded DFS’ regulatory authority in violation of separation of powers.

Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP attorneys Steven Ostrow, Steven Coury and Patrick Haggerty
Mr. Ostrow may be contacted at ostrows@whiteandwilliams.com
Mr. Coury may be contacted at courys@whiteandwilliams.com
Mr. Haggerty may be contacted at haggertyp@whiteandwilliams.com


Year in Review: Top Insurance Cases of 2018

February 19, 2019
Michael S. Levine & Latosha M. Ellis - Hunton Andrews Kurth

2018 was a busy year for courts deciding insurance coverage disputes. Many of those decisions will shape the coverage landscape for years to come. Policyholders enjoyed their fair share of the wins, including substantial victories in areas involving social engineering to disgorgement of corporate gain. We take this opportunity to reflect on some of the year’s most notable coverage decisions.

Social Engineering
2018 was a banner year for decisions addressing losses resulting from social engineering phishing, spoofing and other schemes of trickery and deception.

Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth and Latosha M. Ellis, Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@HuntonAK.com
Ms. Ellis may be contacted at lellis@HuntonAK.com


Texas Supreme Court Holds Anadarko May Be Able to Recover Substantial Deepwater Horizon Defense Costs from Insurers

February 11, 2019
Anthony B. Cavender - Gravel2Gavel

On January 25, the Texas Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in the case of Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and Anadarko E&P Co. v. Houston Cas. Co., et al., characterized as an “interlocutory permissive appeal,” reversing the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting in Beaumont, TX, regarding Anadarko’s insurers’ obligation to pay a significant amount of Anadarko’s legal defense costs that resulted from its liability in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

Mr. Cavender may be contacted at anthony.cavender@pillsburylaw.com


Insured May Recover Consequential Damages From Insurer’s Breach of Duty to Defend

February 6, 2019
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law Hawaii

Answering a certified question, the Nevada Supreme Court determined that an insurer breaching its duty to defend may be liable for consequential damages caused to the insured. Century Sur. Co. c. Andrew, 2018 Nev. LEXIS 112 (Nev. Dec. 13, 2018).

Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


Insured Proves Collapse, but Fails to Establish Any Value for Loss

January 28, 2019
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law Hawaii

While the insured was able to carry his burden to show the collapse of a roof, he failed to establish damages under the policy. Iannucci v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203687 (N.D. N.Y. Dec. 3, 2018).

In 2005, the insured purchased a parcel of land together with a three-story building constructed in 1870. No one resided in the building at the time of purchase or afterward. The building was not well maintained and all utilities were shut off. No work was done on the building between 2005 and 2014. Between 2011 and 2014, the Fire Department issued multiple zoning/ordinance violation notices ordering the insured to make various improvements to the building and property. A notice issued in October 2013 stated that "the roof on your house needs to be replaced." Before any work was done on the roof, however, it collapsed during a snowstorm on February 21, 2014.

Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


Labor Costs Not Excluded From Depreciation When Determining Actual Cash Value

January 21, 2019
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law Hawaii

The court dismissed a class action suit against State Farm which sought to establish that a calculation of actual cash value (ACV) in a homeowners policy could not depreciate the cost of labor. Cranfield v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199618 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 26, 2018)

Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


Forest Fire Constitutes One Occurrence

January 15, 2019
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law Hawaii

The Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that a fire damaging several properties arose from one occurrence. Secura Ins. v. Lyme St. Croix Forest Company, LLC., 2018 Wis. LEXIS 579 Oct. 30, 2018).

A fire broke out on forest land owned by Lyme St. Croix Forest Company. Known as the "Germann Road Fire," it burned 7, 442 acres over three days. Real and personal property belonging to many individuals and businesses were damaged. The fire allegedly began while equipment owned by Ray Duerr Logging, LLC was being repaired. Flames quickly spread from dry grass to a pile of recently felled trees and spread to the surrounding forest.

Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2018

January 9, 2019
Jeffrey J. Vita & Grace V. Hebbel - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

2018 was a year of landmark decisions regarding insurance coverage for a variety of emerging claims, including cyber fraud, the "Me Too" movement, and wildfires. Read on to learn more as well as to find out what cases you should keep your eye on as 2019 unfolds.

1. Black & Veatch Corp. v. Aspen Ins. (Uk) Ltd
882 F.3d 952 (10th Cir. 2018)
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
February 13, 2018
Will New York join the majority in finding that faulty work by a subcontractor is a covered occurrence?

Reprinted courtesy of Jeffrey J. Vita, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Grace V. Hebbel, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
Mr. Vita may be contacted at jjv@sdvlaw.com
Ms. Hebbel may be contacted at gvh@sdvlaw.com


Serious Dump and Ready-Mix Delivery Truck Accidents Edge Higher

January 2, 2019
Scott Van Voorhis – Engineering News-Record

Serious accidents involving dump trucks and ready-mix concrete delivery trucks continue to edge up, part of a persistent, multi-industry problem with poor driving habits that has not yet responded to increased fleet and vehicle insurance premiums. Federal regulators and industry safety experts have sought to cut the accidents by limiting driver fatigue and using technology to keep a closer tab on what happens on the road.

ENR may be contacted at ENR.com@bnpmedia.com



714.701.9180

Arrange No Cost Consultation

johnspringman

markchapman

johntolman

mattnardella

alansturm

davesuggs










Construction Defect News Channel - The Latest News and Video From The Construction Defect Journal

Construction defect and claims video channel.  For access to full construction defect channel content visit the construction defect channel homepage at... ConstructionDefectChannel
Building Africa's City in the Sea

The B1M reported on how Nigeria is reclaiming 10 square kilometres of land from the ocean to create "Eko Atlantic" - a vast new city that is set to become the financial heart of Africa.

Abandoned – Disney’s Legendary Resort

The show Abandoned explains that back in the early 2000's, Walt Disney World had a tough decision on their hands with a brand new value resort they had been building.

Pilot Dead When Helicopter Crashes Into Manhattan High-Rise

CBS Evening News covers the story of a helicopter crashing into a high-rise building.

Anna Maria Leaders Worried About 'McMansions' on the Island

ABC Action News reported that residents of Anna Maria Island are concerned about the growth of larger homes replacing older, smaller homes.

Las Vegas Stadium on Schedule and Budget

Fox5 Las Vegas reports on the progress of the Raiders stadium, which is half-way done.

Australia’s Opal Tower Residents Still Waiting

Heise Says examines the problems of Opal Tower development, which has half of the dwellings uninhabitable since Christmas.

Construction Defect Journal Archives - Recent CD News for Construction Claims Professionals

 

Construction Defect Journal is aggregated from a variety of news sources, article submissions, contributors, and information from industry professionals.

No content on this site should be construed as legal advice or expert opinion. By viewing this site you agree to be bound by its terms and conditions

 

Copyright 2019 - Construction Defect Journal – All Rights Reserved