![Insurer Cannot Abandon Defense Agreement on Underlying Asbestos Claims Against Insured Fountain pen on Claim](https://constructiondefectjournal.com/construction_defect_law/images/nimg/061523_05-claim-form-fountain-pen.png)
Neles-Jamesbury was involved in numerous lawsuits that alleged bodily injury from asbestos exposure.
The court found that the insurer continued to be bound by a defense agreement entered with the insured who merged with another company. Continental Ins. Co. v. Neles-Jamesbury, Inc., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52521 (D. Mass. March 28, 2023).
In 1990, Neles-Jamesbury became the sucessor by merger to the liabilities of Jamesbury Corp. and Neles, Inc. The companies were both in the business of manufacturing and selling valves.
Continental issued two primary CGL policies to Neles, Inc. from 1986 to 1988. After the merger, Neles-Jamesbury was involved in numerous lawsuits that alleged bodily injury from asbestos exposure. Due to the continuing question of whether the policies created duties for Continental, the parties entered into a 2007 Cost Sharing Agreement, which served to clarify and define their respective obligations and coverage in the lawsuits. The agreement noted that Continental wanted to avoid the expense and uncertainties of litigation over defense obligations.
Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com